processor's archives

Featured Articles, GSM, P012UEU, Palm Pre, Pre Plus, Roadrunner, TI OMAP 3430, TI OMAP 3630, Wi-Fi, antenna, battery, bluetooth, fcc, news, palm pre 2, palm pre plus, pre, pre 2, processor, slider, texas instruments, touchstone

P102UEU specs revealed: 1GHz processor, Pre-like design

October 6th 2010 | Posted by Derek Kessler

P102EUE FCC Label

Ever since it was revealed that the P102UEU had gone through the wireless certification battery of the FCC, PreCentral’s forum members and the fine folks at WebOS Internals have been digging through the documents to find more details about the phone. Here’s what’s been uncovered:

  • The processor is clocked at 1GHz. Rod Whitby of WebOS Internals speculates that the processor may be the TI OMAP 3630 (1GHz, single core), which is software- and footprint-compatible (uses the same pins) with the TI OMAP 3430 in the current Pre. Additionally, Texas Instruments claims that the OMAP 3630 provides twice the performance as the older 3430, while sipping half the juice. Battery life gains, anyone?
  • The phone comes with a 1150 mAh battery, exactly the same as the Pre and the Pixi.
  • It is a slider device (as indicated by the SAR ratings for “open” and “closed”).
  • There appears to have been some internal antenna juggling: on the current Pre design all the antennas are hidden behind the battery cover (they’re the yellow-orange strips around the edge of the inside). The documentation notes a difference in distance between the GSM antenna and the Bluetooth/Wi-Fi antenna when the phone is open and closed. Specifically, it’s a movement of 3.5 cm, which is almost exactly how far the current Pre opens.
  • The phone is not only Touchstone compatible (no surprise), but is uses the same back currently available for the Pre and Pre Plus. This means that the phone will have a very similar, if not identical form factor, though we have heard unsubstantiated rumblings that there may be difference on the face of the device.
  • Palm has requested 180 days of confidentiality from the submission to the FCC testing on September 8, 2010. Covered by the confidentiality granted: external, internal, and testing photos and the user manual. Shucks. One hundred eighty days gives Palm confidentiality until March 7, 2011, though we would expect to see this device on shelves and in hands sooner rather than later.
  • As this is FCC testing, the P102UEU is certified to not boil your brains.

With all this we can all but assume that this is going to be called the Palm Pre 2, in fact we’d be willing to bet money on it if we weren’t squirreling it away in anticipation of off-contract purchasing.

UPDATE: As many have pointed out, the FCC label reads 08F-ROAY. The original Pre was the 08F-CASC, as in the "Castle," so it stands to reason that this may be the Roadrunner device we saw pop up in August.

Source: FCC; Via: PreCentral Forums, WebOS Internals on Twitter


READ THE FULL ARTICLE >>

Christmas, Editorials, GPU, Games, Jon Rubinstein, Need For Speed, Palm, Palm Pre, Paratrooper, Pixi, Snapdragon, Sprint, Word Whirl, car charger, editorial, iPhone, lightsaber, palm pixi, pony, pre, processor, touchstone, video recording, webOS, webos 1.3.5

All I want for Christmas (for webOS)

December 24th 2009 | Posted by Derek Kessler

PalmDear Santa,

I know you’re a busy guy and I really should have sent you this letter much earlier, but I know that if anybody could pull off the “Christmas miracle,” it’s you. I’ve tried my best to be a good blogger this year. I know sometimes I’ve aggravated my readers, but I said what I said because I thought it needed to be said. That’s being a good boy, right?

Anyway, I hope that you get this list before you take off from your North Pole base of operations. Below is a list of what I’d really really really like to see on Christmas morning. If it’s not there, I understand, but if it is I promise to be extra good next year. I’m not trying to be greedy, I just want you to know that there’s a lot of stuff that would make me happy. Snow, though one of those things, does not count in the gift tally.

read more

READ THE FULL ARTICLE >>

Palm Pre, mhz, mwc09, news, processor, texas instruments

Palm Pre Processor – TI OMAP 3430, running at 600MHz?

February 18th 2009 | Posted by Dieter Bohn

 

Actually, really, truly new information on the Palm Pre is hard to find, even here at Mobile World Congress 2009.  Palm’s here and showing off the GSM Pre (see our full run down), but it’s running the same ROM we saw at CES, Palm’s sticking to the same talking points, and they won’t let folks get their mitts on them for real (hey, at least Palm is open and chatty on Twitter).  One of the bits of information we’ve been trying to track down: just how fast is the processor on the Pre.

We already knew that the Pre sports the Texas Instruments OMAP3430 processor and that said processor is a speed demon.  The question about how many MHz it runs at is actually sort of moot  – the webOS is all new and whatever the number is, it won’t mean the same thing that number means on other platforms.  Still, it would be nice to know, hey?

Well, I stopped by the Texas Instruments booth today (find out more at WMExperts) and it turns out I missed my chance to see Palm and TI talking jointly about the processor.  I spoke to the TI rep and he said that, no, he wasn’t positive about the Pre’s clock speed, but that the OMAP3430 is typically clocked around 600 MHz and he was fairly sure the Pre wasn’t boosting it up beyond that, though the proc is capable of 800GHz and 1GHz if you want to push it.  (For what it’s worth — and that may not be much — Wikipedia also pegs the OMAP3430’s default clock speed at 600.)

Now, some of you (especially you Windows Mobile folks) may balk at that number, but as I said clock speed doesn’t mean as much as you might think.  First of all, a lot of the heavy lifting these days is done by a graphics processor.  Secondly, although this processor is technically an ARM processor, it’s the new "ARM Cortex-A8," which basically means it’s a beast and it can scale its speed depending on the need to save battery life.  Thirdly, again, we have no idea whether the webOS is heavily dependent on processor speed or not.

So… there you have it.  We still don’t know, but 600MHz doesn’t seem like a completely crazy guess.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE >>